Traits such as height that show a continuous range of variation and do not behave in a simple Mendelian fashion are known as quantitative or complex traits.
A group known as the biometricians discovered that there are correlations between relatives for continuous traits such that tall parents tend to have tall children.
The multifactorial hypothesis proposed that continuous traits are governed by a combination of multiple Mendelian loci, each with a small effect on the trait, and environmental factors.
Using this model, we will then show how quantitative geneticists partition the phenotypic variation in a population into the parts that are due to genetic and environmental factors.
For crop plants, yield, resistance to pathogens, ability to tolerate drought stress, efficiency of fertilizer uptake, and even flavor are all complex traits.
Next, we will develop the mathematical model used to connect the action of genes inside the cell with the phenotypes we observe at the level of the whole organism.
The phenotypic deviation ( x ) is the sum of the genotypic ( g ) and environmental ( e ) deviations, so we can substitute ( g + e ) for x and obtain V X = E ( g 2 ) + E ( e 2 ).
The first term E ( g ) is the genetic variance, the middle term [ E ( e )] is the environmental variance, and the last term is twice the covariance between genotype and environment E ( ge ).
The phenotypic variance is the sum of the variance due to the different genotypes in the population and the variance due to the different environments within which the organisms are reared.
Notice that trait values for the BC plants are intermediate between the two parents as expected but closer to the Beefmaster value because this is a BC population and Beefmaster was the backcross parent.
Although the multifactorial hypothesis provided a sensible explanation for continuous variation, classic Mendelian analysis is inadequate for the study of complex traits.
The simple model for decomposing traits into genetic and environmental deviations, x = g + e, assumes that there is no genotype–environment interaction.
The difference in the trait value between the two inbreds may be different in different environments, and so the difference between the lines averaged over the two environments may not accurately reflect their genetic difference.
The phenotypic variance (V) is the variance of the environmental variance (Ve) assuming that the additive and dominance components are not correlated with the environmental effects.