Self-Disclosure

Cards (20)

  • Self-disclosure is the act of revealing personal information about oneself to another person
  • Self-disclosure is not a set and stable type of communication and varies per individual depending on:
    • age
    • relationship status
    • mood
  • Social Penetration Theory was proposed by Altman and Taylor in 1973
  • Social Penetration Theory describes the process of Self-disclosure beginning with shallow levels of disclosure and gradually progressing deeper
  • Social Penetration Theory (1973):
    1. Superficial (breadth not depth)
    2. Intimate (ambitions)
    3. Personal (hopes, desires and insecurities)
    4. Core (innermost fears)
  • Social penetration theory suggests that as each ‘layer’ is peeled away the relationship becomes stronger
  • Social Comparison Safety was proposed by Festinger (1954)
  • Social Comparison Theory (1954) describes the ways in which an individual will assess their own worth and value by comparing themselves to others
  • Social Comparison Theory (1954):
    1. Upward comparison - feel that their partner is superior to them (e.g. better-looking, richer)
    2. Downward comparison - feel that their partner is inferior to them
  • Social Comparison Theory (1954) states that disclosure could lead to self-validation or determining how similar you are to a person
  • How does Self-Disclosure affect attraction and relationships?
    • SPT argues that SD is essential for a relationship
    • SPT claims that SD is a glue that reinforces a bond
  • How does Self-Disclosure affect attraction and relationships?
    • Disclosing high personal details can lead to vulnerability
    • SCT suggest that people engage in social comparison via SD to determine whether to pursue the relationship
  • Self-Disclosure Research - Collins and Miller (1994):
    A meta-analysis showing that SD plays a key role in relationship maitenance
  • Self-Disclosure Research - Tang et al (2013):
    American couples make more Self disclosure then Chinese couples but relationship satisfaction was high in both (cultural variation)
  • PEEL Paragraphs - Self Disclosure:
    1. Strength - Real life application
    2. Strength - Supporting Study
    3. Weakness - Subjective explanation
    4. Weakness - Not a full explanation
    5. Weakness - Cultural variations
  • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 1:
    Strength - RLA - Self-disclosure emphasis open communication and can be used to inform relationship counselling
  • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 2:
    Strength - Supporting Study - Sprecher and Hendrick (2004) - studied heterosexual dating couples
    • found a strong correlation between satisfaction and disclosure
    • SD led to more satisfied and committed relationships
  • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 3:
    Weakness - SD is subjective, therefore it is hard to operationalise
    • lacks features of science
  • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 4:
    Weakness - not a full explanation - SD doesn’t account for all relationships and they are still healthy
  • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 5:
    Weakness - Cultural differences - findings are often from western cultures and so can’t be generalised
    (Tang et al)